CoinTrust

Pluto Studio’s Catizen Token Changes Spark Outrage Among Players

Kelly Cromley
pluto studio catizen token sparks outrage

Pluto Studio, the developer behind the Web3 play-to-earn (P2E) game Catizen, recently altered the rules surrounding the highly anticipated CATI token airdrop, causing widespread dissatisfaction among players. The changes, which were announced on September 14, have led to intense criticism from the game’s community, as many players feel the modifications are unfair and inconsistent with earlier promises.

The developer’s decision, which reduced the token allocation originally pledged to players, has prompted a significant backlash. Players expressed frustration on social media platforms, accusing the developers of breaking their word and favoring those who spent money within the game over those who participated actively without financial investments.

Unveiling the Airdrop Structure: Players Discontent

In a public statement shared on social media, Tim Wong, a member of the Catizen Foundation, outlined the details of the revised tokenomics for the CATI token airdrop. Pluto Studio announced that 34% of the total supply of 1 billion CATI tokens would be distributed through airdrops. However, they also allocated 9% of the total tokens to Binance Launchpool, an aspect not mentioned in previous communications. This addition has been a major point of contention, as developers had initially committed to a 43% airdrop allocation, leaving players feeling misled.

Moreover, only 15% of the airdropped tokens will be awarded as part of the Season 1 rewards, while the remaining 19% will be reserved for future quarterly airdrop campaigns. This adjustment has frustrated many, who expected a more substantial initial allocation based on their time and effort invested in the game.

As part of the airdrop allocation changes, developers also revealed the number of tokens players would receive when the CATI tokens are launched. The announcement disappointed a large portion of the player base, with several users venting their frustration in online forums and social media platforms like X. One player highlighted their dissatisfaction by pointing out their high ranking in the game relative to the small number of tokens they were allocated, questioning the fairness of the distribution process.

Shift in Token Allocation Criteria Adds to Player Frustration

In addition to the surprise adjustment in the airdrop percentage, many players were disheartened by the developers’ decision to move away from an in-game earning model. Initially, Catizen developers had assured players that vKitty earnings within the game would be the primary factor determining the airdrop allocation. However, the updated announcement indicated that this would no longer be the case. Developers explained that this decision was made in response to the discovery of cheating among some players, which disrupted the original allocation plans.


This shift has sparked further anger among players who felt the cheating issue could have been handled differently. Instead of removing dishonest players from the system, many feel that developers unfairly shifted the focus toward rewarding those who had financially contributed to the game. Some members of the community took to social media to voice their concerns, alleging that the developers chose to prioritize players who spent money on in-game purchases while disregarding loyal participants who engaged with the game consistently without spending money.


This perception of unfairness has led to an online outcry, with many players using the hashtag #catizenscam to share their disappointment and frustration. The community’s anger stems largely from their belief that the game’s economic model now favors paying players over those who contribute significant time and effort.

Drop in Player Engagement and Community Backlash

Following the announcement of the tokenomics changes, player activity in Catizen has dropped sharply. According to data from DappRadar, the number of daily transactions in the game plummeted from 1.48 million on September 13 to just 110,620 on September 14. This drastic decline highlights the community’s dissatisfaction with the altered airdrop structure and suggests that players are losing faith in the game’s overall fairness.

The combination of a reduced airdrop allocation, perceived favoritism toward paying players, and lack of transparency has left many Catizen players feeling disillusioned. Despite the significant anticipation surrounding the CATI token launch, the developer’s recent actions have led to a growing distrust within the community.

Many players have emphasized that the developers should have focused on identifying and banning cheaters instead of making broad changes to the token distribution model that penalized honest players. The sudden shift in allocation criteria has left a sour taste in the mouths of many who had been looking forward to the launch of the CATI token.

Long-Term Impact on Catizen’s Player Base

The recent controversy surrounding Pluto Studio’s handling of the CATI token airdrop has caused a considerable decline in player engagement, and the game’s long-term success may depend on how developers address the community’s concerns moving forward. The significant drop in transactions and the widespread use of the #catizenscam hashtag indicate that many players feel betrayed by the sudden changes.

If Catizen developers hope to regain the trust of their player base, they may need to offer clearer communication, greater transparency, and a solution that balances fairness with financial incentives. How the team chooses to navigate this turbulent period could determine whether Catizen can recover from the current backlash or continue to see its player base dwindle.

Exit mobile version